Happy New Year!
January 1, 2012 at 6:01 am | Posted in Uncategorized | 17 CommentsEgad! 2012! The end of the world!
..But if you think about it, the “end of the world” is closer to 2013 than 2012.
Have a great year! Also, this was posted right at midnight, yay.
17 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply
-
Recent Comments
kirbydavy on Sorry for my Idleness Jake on Sorry for my Idleness kirbydavy on Sorry for my Idleness Jake on Sorry for my Idleness kirbydavy on Sorry for my Idleness
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
What are your new years resolutions? Mine is to actually have one.
Despite the drought, the recent fire outbreak, and the LAW, people are setting off fireworks right now..
Comment by kirbydavy— January 1, 2012 #
Happy New Year~ or should i say… “End year~” According to some people, like my teacher who actually believes the end is coming this year.. -.-
Comment by Pinky— January 1, 2012 #
The theoretical ‘end’ isn’t exactly the end of the world, it’s just an economical breakdown and all that.
Comment by kirbydavy— January 1, 2012 #
may you define ‘all that’?……… exactly the ‘end’ ……….. it will happen…………… but not now……………… probably in like 5 million years or so…. and an economical breakdown…… yeah, right <_<…. probably not right now my friends……. and for new years resolutions …. to actually have one? well you need another resolution then since you nee one, …………… and fireworks are legal in our area this year………….. it rained in our area the last few weeks…….. recent fire outbreak? that's even a better idea to have fireworks! if there was a recent fire outbreak it would destroy the fuel for the fireworks to catch anything on fire… – my thoughts so far
Comment by it'sme— January 2, 2012 #
I don’t believe in 2012, but yes, it will eventually happen when the sun dies. According to other people fireworks were banned because of the drought. The recent fire outbreak was caused by the drought, so I really don’t see the logic here.. It doesn’t matter if it rained recently, it didn’t rain that much and the dryness makes fireworks very vulnerable to causing a grass fire and/or any other fire. Plus it wasn’t wet yesterday (New years). And ‘all that’ refers to the details of the economical breakdown which I never said would happen.
-My set to be argued with argument so far
Comment by kirbydavy— January 2, 2012 #
The World ends when my sister turns 24. haha. I love that..
Comment by milanais— January 2, 2012 #
I said in 5 million years also known as when the sun will die. =P And what economical breakdown? Where do you get this from? And according to other people? What people? Recent fire outbreak what recent fire outbreak? And it dose not have to rain that much. =P Moisture stays in the ground for a long time. it doesn’t have to rain yesterday! Logic? This is common sense my friend! The logic i don’t see is your ‘ economic breakdown’! You don’t believe in 2012? It already happened this is 2012. I don’t believe the apocalypse is going to happen soon but the year it self exits. And your set? What set? ? It does matter if it rained recently as a matter of fact. Details of the economic breakdown? There will not be one this year.
- A short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far’
Comment by tevinh123— January 4, 2012 #
I never said it would/wouldn’t happen in 5 million years? I said eventually, which could mean anything. It doesn’t matter the details of the economical breakdown, since it’s theoretical and the 2012 theory can be various things. I never said there would be an economical breakdown either. I said that’s what I heard in A theory. I know that’s a loophole, but just because someone doesn’t believe in something doesn’t mean it won’t necessarily happen, like the guy that didn’t believe in rapists. It doesn’t change anything.. especially in his case.. Set? If you mean ‘my set to be argued with argument’, you read that wrong.. Or you’re just doing some crazy loophole which I don’t seem to understand. Define ‘recently’, because it hasn’t rained for at least one week. I didn’t say there would be an economic breakdown this year, in fact, I don’t even agree with any theoretical 2012 event.
-A short summary of errors in your ‘a short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far”
Comment by kirbydavy— January 5, 2012 #
Sly no understand what words Kirbydavy speaking….. o_e
Comment by Sly (Cpr-Senate)— January 5, 2012 #
Well first off you did say “The theoretical ‘end’ isn’t exactly the end of the world, it’s just an economical breakdown and all that.” and no sh*t if someone doesn’t agree with something it doesn’t mean it is not going to happen! ” I never said there would be an economical breakdown either. I said that’s what I heard in A theory.” well you did post that theory saying it was going to happen <_<, so no blaming another 'person'. And if a person doesn't believe in rapists it does change something, they don't believe in rapists. And i did not read that wrong on your '-My set to be argued with argument so far', if you think i did you must of made some typo. I didn't say you said the world is going to end in 5 million years =P i said i said it. So why don't you check yourself next time? And want a definition, normally i would get the google definition but in your case you obviously cant just go search up a word in the dictionary? Or are you too lazy, just like your too lazy to take pre- AP classes? -Some corrections in your '-A short summary of errors in ‘a short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far”'
Comment by tevinh123— January 7, 2012 #
Um.. responding to half of this would just lead to complete redundancy in terms of already-said responses. Skipping to the end; “And want a definition, normally i would get the google definition but in your case you obviously cant just go search up a word in the dictionary?”, wouldn’t that mean you’re too lazy too, since you asked me to define something which was a sequence of words, not an actual word that has a definition. “Or are you too lazy, just like your too lazy to take pre- AP classes?”, this comeback was pretty witty, but really ironic considering you’re in pre-AP and I’m not and you typed “your”, not “you’re”. Or were you too lazy to type you’re?
~Some small corrections/comebacks in your ‘Some corrections in your ‘-A short summary of errors in ‘a short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far””
By the way, I got a new mic that isn’t falling apart to death, so we could continue Life of Kirbster or something this summer. =D
Comment by kirbydavy— January 7, 2012 #
Well it is called a typo as I believe, and did you not ever listen to Mrs. Cook in 5th grade? ” Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day, but teach a man how to fish he will eat for a lifetime.” Ah, but of course you went to home-school. And i was not to lazy to type ‘you’re’, If you call it a comeback not really, see I can give you another definition on comeback, well I definitely am tired of this argument, but will continue if you do, since you are being quite redundant. ~ My opinion on ” ~Some small corrections/comebacks in your ‘Some corrections in your ‘-A short summary of errors in ‘a short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far”””
Comment by tevinh123— January 9, 2012 #
That’s not even the reason that happened for the few last weeks of school.. Nothing to do with laziness. You have said your in place of you’re before, so I guess you have been making typos a lot. To avoid the redundancy that I do that you speak (or type) of, let’s end this here. ~The conclusion of ‘” ~Some small corrections/comebacks in your ‘Some corrections in your ‘-A short summary of errors in ‘a short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far””””
Comment by kirbydavy— January 9, 2012 #
Lets agree to Disagree, or let bygones be bygones, or (insert some conflict ending phrase here) etc. – The end of a “~The conclusion of ‘” ~Some small corrections/comebacks in your ‘Some corrections in your ‘-A short summary of errors in ‘a short summary of errors in your ‘set to be argued with argument so far”””””
Comment by tevinh123— January 10, 2012 #
Accordingly, my teacher said that the world will end this year, by floods, tornadoes, tsunamis, and more happening all at the same time, she also said it was in the bible, and i too, have not hear of the economical breakdown, But yet, it COULD happen, who knows?
Yet, we will never know when the world may end, yes, maybe a million years from now, but how do you know for sure? that is the problem. yet, this is kinda a interesting topic, Id say.
As for Sly, you should know. (:
and Milana: Lol. poor sister. (:
As for it’sme… uh..
The conclusion, id say, once its December 2012, im gonna watch the movie 2012 at midnight, (if there is one.) and see if the world will end, if it does not, i will laugh at the movie.
If the world does end this year, we will never grow up with our dream jobs.. D: no college for us.. Sadly, but yet it may never happen.
What is the point of this topic? its a long, but, a very opinionated topic, we all have a different thought of how it may end, correct?
Well, i think i wrote enough. im gonna play a game, now..
~ My thoughts so far… ~Pinky
Comment by Pinky— January 7, 2012 #
I think that all this bullcrap is true and I’m just gonna mash it up together. *ahem*
BLAHBLAHEWRJHDUEAJDHVKJJERFEAJRE ECONOMICAL BREAKDOWN- AHEVAKJIYIUOAJHKVDKLAMREAFOVLKSDM WITH FLOODS, TORNADOES, AND TSUNAMIS, AND MOOOAAAAR HAPPENING. ADIFKJHUIAWJERHFIUDVOJLNRAOIFLDKV PINKY USES OLD FACEBOOK JOKE THAT SHE’S GONNA WATCH 2012 AT DECEMBER 2012 AT MIDNIGHT AND LAUGH AT THE MOVIE. AUHOFIJNHIEROFIJLKVDKNJHHUIKJ,E FIREWORKS STORY THINGIE THAT I DIDN’T BOTHER TO READ BECAUSE THERE ARE SO MANY “……..”‘S BUT I ACTUALLY AGREE WITH TEV AND KIRBY, IT COULD BE AN ECONOMICAL BREAKDOWN. kthxbai
Comment by Jake— January 7, 2012 #
I couldn’t of said it better if I ever said that.
And actually Tevinh disagrees that there will be an economical breakdown. And.. I do too.. that’s just one of the theories I heard. Despite the total unrelatedness, I just realized where your email name came from.
Comment by kirbydavy— January 7, 2012 #